Academic Method — Institutional

Programme Design Diagnostic

How robust is
the learning design
across your programmes?

A free diagnostic built for institutions, L&D teams, and programme leaders — assessing the structural quality of learning design across six research pillars. Results in under 10 minutes.

Confidential. No account required. Results for internal use.

What this diagnostic covers

01
Learning Science ApplicationIs programme design informed by evidence on memory, retention, and transfer?
02
Cognitive DesignIs load managed? Are mental models constructed deliberately across modules?
03
Engagement ArchitectureAre learners retained by design or by obligation?
04
Programme Structure & DesignIs information hierarchy and learner journey intentionally designed?
05
Institutional Laws & LogicAre foundational design principles applied consistently across the portfolio?
06
Quality Assurance & GovernanceDo validation, review, and feedback systems meet professional standards?
30
Questions
6
Pillars
~10
Minutes
Academic Method — Institutional Programme Diagnostic
0 / 30
✉
Step 02 — Receive the report

Where should we send
the diagnostic summary?

Your results will appear on screen, and a clean summary will be sent to your inbox — pillar-by-pillar diagnosis and recommended next steps.

All details are treated as confidential and used only to deliver the report and any follow-up opted into. Read our privacy policy.

Institutional Programme Diagnostic — Academic Method — out of 100

Pillar Breakdown
Where the programmes are strong — and where they need work.
Diagnosis
Pillar-by-pillar breakdown
The Next Step

Let's talk about
closing the gaps.

Book a confidential 30-minute consultation with Kevin Fenemore. We'll walk through the diagnostic, talk specifics about the programmes, and decide together whether there's a fit for a deeper engagement.

— Kevin Fenemore, Founder, Academic Method